Friday, 25 September 2026European Markets

TotalEnergiesGabon And DNO Have A High Dividend Yield And Return On Equity In The Oil & Gas E&P Industry.

Loading stream...

(vianews) - totalenergiesgabon (ec.pa) is among this list of stock assets with the highest dividend rate and return on equity on the oil & gas e&p industry.

financial asset price forward dividend yield return on equity
totalenergiesgabon (ec.pa) €167.80 13.22% 1.49%
dno (dno.ol) kr11.12 9.94% 19.33%

several euronext companies pay out dividends to its shareholders. the dividend yield is a dividend to price ratio showing how much a company pays out in dividends each year.

1. totalenergiesgabon (ec.pa)

13.22% forward dividend yield and 1.49% return on equity

totalenergies ep gabon société anonyme engages in the mining, exploration, and production of crude oil in gabon. it also holds interests in operated and non-operated production fields. the company was formerly known as total gabon. the company was incorporated in 1949 and is headquartered in port gentil, gabon. totalenergies ep gabon société anonyme is a subsidiary of totalenergies se.

earnings per share

as for profitability, totalenergiesgabon has a trailing twelve months eps of €72.87.

pe ratio

totalenergiesgabon has a trailing twelve months price to earnings ratio of 2.3. meaning, the purchaser of the share is investing €2.3 for every euro of annual earnings.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 1.49%.

more news about totalenergiesgabon.

2. dno (dno.ol)

9.94% forward dividend yield and 19.33% return on equity

dno asa engages in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas assets in the middle east, the north sea, and west africa. the company holds 75% operating interests in the tawke and peshkabir fields, and 64% operating interests in the e baeshiqa license located in the kurdistan region of iraq; has production licenses across 10 fields norway and two fields in the united kingdom; and operating interests in the producing block ci-27, as well as operates the exploration block ci-12 in west africa. dno asa was founded in 1971 and is headquartered in oslo, norway.

earnings per share

as for profitability, dno has a trailing twelve months eps of kr-0.53.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 19.33%.

earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization

dno's ebitda is 6.14.

stock price classification

according to the stochastic oscillator, a useful indicator of overbought and oversold conditions, dno's stock is considered to be overbought (>=80).

more news about dno.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Enterprise AI Agents Scale Up Through Partnerships and Funding, But Data Readiness Lags Ambition
A wave of vertical AI-agent startups (Swarm, Veridox, Avallon AI, DA2, F2, Earthian, Meanwhile, Covecta, Penguin AI, Maisa AI) is being funded and profiled just as major infrastructure players — Microsoft/Mistral, Siemens/NVIDIA, and Manulife/Microsoft — cement enterprise AI governance and compute partnerships. Yet a Google Cloud report shows AI agents still lack access to the majority of company data (only 45% on average), and insider selling at incumbent C3.ai signals investor caution even as adoption intent (100% planned agentic AI use within two years) races ahead of actual data infrastructure.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Berkshire Hathaway
Both facts report Berkshire Hathaway's cash position on 2026-01-01 with identical observation timestamps, but claim vastly different values: 380 billion USD vs 400 USD. These cannot both be true for the same entity at the same point in time. The magnitude of the discrepancy (a factor of ~10^9) rules out rounding, unit conversion, or methodological differences.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com