Saturday, 31 October 2026European Markets

SEABIRD EXPLORAT And SCHLUMBERGER Have A High Dividend Yield And Return On Equity In The Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry.

Loading stream...

(vianews) - seabird explorat (sbx.ol) is among this list of stock assets with the highest dividend rate and return on equity on the oil & gas equipment & services industry.

financial asset price forward dividend yield return on equity
seabird explorat (sbx.ol) kr4.29 5.8% 23.16%
schlumberger (slb.pa) €50.73 2.01% 21.73%

several euronext companies pay out dividends to its shareholders. the dividend yield is a dividend to price ratio showing how much a company pays out in dividends each year.

1. seabird explorat (sbx.ol)

5.8% forward dividend yield and 23.16% return on equity

seabird exploration plc, together with its subsidiaries, provides marine 2d and 3d seismic data for the oil and gas industry in europe, africa, the middle east, north and south america, and the asia pacific. it offers 2d seismic; and source vessels that provide conventional undershoot, 4d repeat survey, wide azimuth, push reverse, long-term charter and vessel management, in-house source modelling and environmental decay analysis, and spot charter services. the company was founded in 1996 and is based in nicosia, cyprus.

earnings per share

as for profitability, seabird explorat has a trailing twelve months eps of kr0.32.

pe ratio

seabird explorat has a trailing twelve months price to earnings ratio of 13.41. meaning, the purchaser of the share is investing kr13.41 for every norwegian krone of annual earnings.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 23.16%.

volume

today's last reported volume for seabird explorat is 65212 which is 29.43% below its average volume of 92420.

more news about seabird explorat.

2. schlumberger (slb.pa)

2.01% forward dividend yield and 21.73% return on equity

schlumberger limited engages in the provision of technology for the energy industry worldwide. the company operates through four divisions: digital & integration, reservoir performance, well construction, and production systems. the company provides field development and hydrocarbon production, carbon management, and integration of adjacent energy systems; reservoir interpretation and data processing services for exploration data; and well construction and production improvement services and products. it also offers subsurface geology and fluids evaluation information; open and cased hole services; exploration and production pressure, and flow-rate measurement services; and pressure pumping, well stimulation, and coiled tubing equipment solutions. in addition, the company offers mud logging, directional drilling, measurement-while-drilling, and logging-while-drilling services, as well as engineering support services; supplies drilling fluid systems; designs, manufactures, and markets roller cone and fixed cutter drill bits; bottom-hole-assembly and borehole enlargement technologies; well cementing products and services; well planning, well drilling, engineering, supervision, logistics, procurement, and contracting of third parties, as well as drilling rig management solutions; and drilling equipment and services, as well as land drilling rigs and related services. further, it provides artificial lift production equipment and optimization services; supplies packers, safety valves, sand control technology, and various intelligent well completions technology and equipment; designs and manufactures valves, chokes, actuators, and surface trees; and onesubsea, an integrated solutions, products, systems, and services, including wellheads, subsea trees, manifolds and flowline connectors, control systems, connectors, and services. the company was formerly known as socie´te´ de prospection e´lectrique. schlumberger limited was founded in 1926 and is based in houston, texas.

earnings per share

as for profitability, schlumberger has a trailing twelve months eps of €2.69.

pe ratio

schlumberger has a trailing twelve months price to earnings ratio of 18.86. meaning, the purchaser of the share is investing €18.86 for every euro of annual earnings.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 21.73%.

volatility

schlumberger's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was a negative 0.13%, a positive 0.37%, and a positive 1.05%.

schlumberger's highest amplitude of average volatility was 0.73% (last week), 0.86% (last month), and 1.05% (last quarter).

more news about schlumberger.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
ESMO 2026 Oncology Data Wave Builds Toward Ivonescimab PDUFA, While Micro-Cap Biotech Exits the Market
Late October 2026 is a dense catalyst window led by ESMO 2026. Daiichi Sankyo's DXd antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) programs (DESTINY-Lung04, DESTINY-Breast11, REJOICE-Ovarian01/02, TUXEDO-3), Guardant's 25 abstracts and the PACE-LUNG ctDNA trial all report there. These feed into the FDA's 14 November 2026 PDUFA date for ivonescimab. Large and mid-cap developers with late-stage data and commercial launches (ZEGFROVY, ANKTIVA, MIUDELLA, lorundrostat, duvakitug) are drawing capital and attention. Spago Nanomedical's board decision to seek a Nasdaq First North delisting (EGM 19 November, application 25 January 2027) shows the capital squeeze on early-stage, single-asset names (Tumorad is Phase I).
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,994
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,994 facts checked against source5,514 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com