Thursday, 15 October 2026European Markets
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document

Future AI chips could be built on glass

View original at technologyreview.com
MIT Technology Review - Ai Research Title: Future AI chips could be built on glass Date: 2026-03-13 09:00 Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/13/1134230/future-ai-chips-could-be-built-on-glass/ <p>Human-made glass is thousands of years old…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • As AI workloads surge and package sizes expand, the industry is confronting very real mechanical constraints that impact the trajectory of high-performance computing, with warpage being one of the most fundamental issues

    60% confidence
  • Glass can be made 5,000 times smoother than organic substrates, which would eliminate defects that can arise as metal gets layered onto semiconductors

    60% confidence
  • The semiconductor market for glass could grow from $1 billion in 2025 to as much as $4.4 billion by 2036

    60% confidence
  • Absolics has led the way in commercializing glass substrates

    60% confidence
  • Glass thermal stability could allow engineers to create 10 times more connections per millimeter than organic substrates

    60% confidence
  • As AI workloads surge and package sizes expand, the industry is confronting very real mechanical constraints that impact the trajectory of high-performance computing, with warpage being one of the most fundamental issues

    60% confidence
  • The semiconductor market for glass could grow from $1 billion in 2025 to as much as $4.4 billion by 2036

    60% confidence
  • Intel realized about a decade ago that there would be limitations with organic substrates

    60% confidence
  • This is not the first attempt to adopt glass in semiconductor packaging, but this time the ecosystem is more solid and wider, and the need for glass-based technology is sharper

    60% confidence
  • Intel's R&D teams are reliably fabricating glass panels and producing test chip packages, a significant improvement from early testing days when hundreds of glass panels got cracked every couple of days

    60% confidence
  • Multiple large manufacturers including Samsung Electronics, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, and LG Innotek have significantly accelerated their research and pilot production efforts in glass packaging over the past year, suggesting the glass substrate ecosystem is evolving from a single early mover to a broader industrial race

    60% confidence
  • This is not the first attempt to adopt glass in semiconductor packaging, but this time the ecosystem is more solid and wider and the need for glass-based technology is sharper

    60% confidence
  • The benefits of glass core substrates are undeniable and will drive the industry to make this happen sooner rather than later

    60% confidence
  • Glass substrates unlock the ability to keep scaling package footprints without hitting a mechanical wall

    60% confidence
  • Glass can be made 5,000 times smoother than organic substrates, eliminating defects that can arise as metal gets layered onto semiconductors

    60% confidence
  • Absolics has led the way in commercializing glass substrates

    60% confidence
  • The benefits of glass core substrates are undeniable and will drive the industry to make this happen sooner rather than later

    60% confidence
  • Glass holds enormous potential for the future of energy-efficient AI compute because light-based systems could move signals with far less energy than power-hungry copper pathways

    60% confidence
  • Glass thermal stability could allow engineers to create 10 times more connections per millimeter than organic substrates

    60% confidence
  • In early testing days, hundreds of glass panels got cracked every couple of days at Intel

    60% confidence
  • Intel's designers can stuff 50% more silicon chips into the same package area with glass substrates, improving computational capability

    60% confidence
  • Intel realized about a decade ago that there would be limitations with organic substrates

    60% confidence
  • Glass holds enormous potential for the future of energy-efficient AI compute because a light-based system could move signals around with far less energy than power-hungry copper pathways

    60% confidence
  • Glass substrates unlock the ability to keep scaling package footprints without hitting a mechanical wall

    60% confidence
  • Multiple large manufacturers including Samsung Electronics, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, and LG Innotek have significantly accelerated their research and pilot production efforts in glass packaging over the past year

    60% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Q4 2026 Biopharma Catalyst Cluster: Late-Stage Readouts and Regulatory Milestones
October 2026 brings a dense run of Phase 3 wins (ALOFT-IPF, RESTORE-3), new data presentations (Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Vertex, Galderma) and regulatory steps (FDA acceptance of Roche's vamikibart BLA, Scholar Rock's EMA resubmission). The next big catalyst is the ivonescimab FDA PDUFA date on 2026-11-14. Obesity combination studies (REDEFINE 4, TOGETHER-PsO) and the 2027 Maritime-1 completion point to more catalysts ahead. QAIAx's speculative AI-linked trial claims (the QIII pilot, targeted for 2027) are an unrelated micro-cap sideshow with weak evidence, and have little in common with the large-cap pipeline news.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,986
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,986 facts checked against source5,377 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com