Sunday, 13 September 2026European Markets
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleYahoo Finance· November 30, 2025

Can you retire comfortably on Social Security alone? We asked seniors.

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Can you retire comfortably on Social Security alone? We asked seniors. Is it possible to live comfortably in retirement on Social Security income alone?…
Opening lines of the source · Yahoo Finance · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • I'm lucky because she has that mentality, 'Take care of your parents.' I'll never be out on the streets

    80% confidence
  • I feel very fortunate that our careers kept us at the higher end of Social Security earnings

    80% confidence
  • People spend dramatically less after they retire. The rat race you get when you're working drops off in retirement

    80% confidence
  • We are frugal people. Almost everything in our house is recycled, used, thrifted, but it looks nice and everything works

    80% confidence
  • From everything I read prior to retiring, I didn't think it was possible to live on Social Security alone

    80% confidence
  • For one thing, I look for everything that's free. If it's not free, it's damn near free

    80% confidence
  • I have worked so hard all my life, working two jobs, sometimes three, and it has really been a struggle

    80% confidence
  • It was rough when I first started. The check was so low

    80% confidence
  • It's been a year and a week, and I'm not struggling at all. When I hear people say, 'I can't live on Social Security,' it's like, Why not?

    80% confidence
  • It's not optimal to just get by, but that's the way it is

    80% confidence
  • Social Security will face a shortfall by 2035

    80% confidence
  • There's nobody really to blame for our current financial change other than me, because I was never going to get old

    80% confidence
  • We made $150,000, we spent $150,000

    80% confidence
  • You can retire with a lot less than $1 million in the bank: $50,000 to $100,000 in savings should do it

    80% confidence
  • We're going to have to make a decision next spring about what we're going to do, or I'm going to continue to pull down our savings, and I don't have any way of replacing that

    80% confidence
  • At some point, you realize that I'm 79 years old. There's not a whole lot we need. We have a comfortable life. We have a lot of really good friends

    80% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Chip Boom Lifts Semiconductors as Export-Control Gaps Persist
AI infrastructure demand is fueling a broad semiconductor rally — Broadcom's AI chip revenue and Q4 guidance, Amazon's custom silicon crossing a $25B annual run rate, and bullish analyst calls on Micron and Sandisk tied to a memory chip boom underestimated even by bulls — with ASML rallying on sympathy. That momentum runs alongside unresolved US-China tech tensions: Belgium's arrest of a suspect for stealing chip technology for China and a blacklisted Chinese firm still acquiring Nvidia's top AI chips show export-control enforcement lagging the pace of AI chip demand.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Both facts record the same attribute (net_income) for JPMorgan Chase & Co. in the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31), but report values that differ by approximately 1 billion times: $16,494,000,000 vs $16.49. These cannot both be true simultaneously. The discrepancy suggests either a unit mismatch (e.g., one is total net income, the other earnings per share mislabeled as net_income), a decimal point error, or data entry corruption. For the same entity, attribute, and time period, only one value can be correct.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,280 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com