Friday, 18 September 2026European Markets
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Press releaseGlobeNewswire· March 23, 2026

Amphista Therapeutics announces three presentations at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting on its next-generation Targeted Glue™ degrader programs

View original at globenewswire.com
Amphista Therapeutics announces three presentations at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting on its next-generation Targeted Glue™ degrader programs Cambridge, UK, 23rd March 2026 – Amphista Therapeutics (“the Company” or “Amphista”), a leader in the discovery and development of non-cereblon/non-V…
Opening lines of the source · GlobeNewswire · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • SMARCA4 mutations are observed in >5% NSCLC patients and are associated with poor prognosis and advanced disease

    60% confidence
  • Amphista has achieved compound profiles that uniquely position them to deliver class-leading SMARCA2 degraders for the treatment of SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC

    60% confidence
  • TEAD degraders demonstrate exceptional on-pathway selectivity profiles and exhibit the expected Hippo signalling modulation

    60% confidence
  • Five-year survival rates for AML remain at just 33% and is the cause of death for an estimated 130,000 patients globally each year

    60% confidence
  • Degradation of BRD9 releases the differentiation block and leads to the differentiation and death of AML blasts

    60% confidence
  • SMARCA2 degraders achieve near complete selectivity over SMARCA4 in a SMARCA4 WT model

    60% confidence
  • Optimised SMARCA2 compounds can deliver fast, deep degradation of SMARCA2 as demonstrated in-vivo in a disease-relevant SMARCA4 mutant model

    60% confidence
  • Amphista is a leader in the discovery and development of non-cereblon/non-VHL Targeted Glue degraders

    60% confidence
  • Aldehyde-mediated degrons are a viable strategy for targeted protein degradation, enabling rational design of degraders that hijack endogenous protein quality control machinery for precision medicine applications

    60% confidence
  • SMARCA2 degraders potently drive >95% SMARCA2 degradation within 4 hours, resulting in deep suppression of biomarkers KRT80 and PLAU in vitro

    60% confidence
  • SMARCA2 Targeted Glues induce degradation via selective recruitment of DCAF16 and covalent interaction with a single DCAF16 cysteine residue

    60% confidence
  • Amine-based TEAD degrader scaffolds undergo extracellular conversion to reactive aldehyde species, which mediate covalent engagement of FBXO22 C326, triggering TEAD proteasomal degradation

    60% confidence
  • TEAD degraders achieve enhanced degradation profiles compared to previously reported FBXO22-targeting approaches

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Industry Reckoning: Safety Warnings Collide With Slowdown-Driven Market Jitters
A wave of high-profile safety concerns — Dario Amodei's call for a global slowdown in frontier AI development, Microsoft's humanist AI code of conduct, and researcher departures from Anthropic and Google citing safety risks — is converging with investor unease, as seen in GE Vernova's 8.6% stock drop on the slowdown call and Palantir's 6% decline. The narrative reflects growing tension between rapid AI commercialization and mounting governance, safety, and market-sustainability concerns.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,982
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,982 facts checked against source5,297 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com