Saturday, 31 October 2026European Markets

Bank of England leads global easing cycle with 84% probability of March rate cuts

The Bank of England is expected to deliver rate cuts in March 2026 with 84% probability, leading a coordinated global easing cycle as inflation moderates across major economies. European central banks are following suit, while the Federal Reserve faces leadership uncertainty with Powell and Miran terms expiring. RSM projects two cuts for 2026, though sticky services inflation remains above target levels.

Bank of England leads global easing cycle with 84% probability of March rate cuts
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.
Loading stream...

The Bank of England is expected to cut rates in March 2026 with 84% probability, leading a coordinated global easing cycle as inflation pressures moderate across major economies. This positions the BoE ahead of both the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank in monetary policy loosening.

Recent MPC voting patterns and UK inflation data point to earlier easing than markets initially forecast. Debapratim De projects two 25-basis-point cuts between now and autumn, with the first arriving in April. Easing inflation and a cooling labour market have created conditions for rate reductions.

The eurozone faces coordination challenges as the Bank of England accelerates its easing timeline. European financial markets are responding to the divergence in monetary policy paths, with implications for cross-border capital flows and currency markets. The ECB must balance domestic economic conditions against the BoE's more aggressive stance.

European bank profitability could face pressure from the easing cycle. Lower rates compress net interest margins, though increased lending volumes may partially offset the impact. Banks with significant UK exposure face the most immediate margin compression as BoE cuts materialize.

The Federal Reserve's path remains uncertain as Chair Powell and adviser Miran's terms expire. Markets are building dovish expectations for late-2026 cuts, though RSM economist Joe Nguyen cautions that sticky services inflation creates a higher bar for rate reductions. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 could inject $100 billion into the US economy, potentially delaying Fed cuts.

Thomas Pugh warns that services inflation remains stickier than headline inflation. A third UK rate cut later in 2026 represents downside risk rather than the base case, especially if the labour market weakens further. The divergence between goods and services inflation complicates the easing timeline.

Emerging markets are following developed economy central banks into the easing cycle. The coordinated nature of rate cuts across major economies suggests inflation moderation is becoming entrenched, though regional variations in economic conditions create uncertainty around the pace of monetary policy normalization.

Source documents

Via News is a conduit. We point to the source documents behind this report — we don't replace them. Trace any claim to its source and decide what to trust. How we source

Source Trace Score9 source documents9 with a live linkVerifiability: Strong
  1. [1]News articleYahoo Finance· November 8, 2025
    Data Fog Intensifying for Fed as Shutdown Delays US Inflation Numbers
  2. [2]News articleYahoo Finance· November 15, 2025
    Europe Gauges Fallout From Trump’s Year of Trade Chaos
  3. [3]News articleYahoo Finance· February 18, 2026
    FTSE 100 Live: Index powers to new highs as inflation falls, defence in demand
  4. [4]News articleYahoo Finance· January 26, 2026
    How many rate cuts in 2026? These mounting pressures will put the Fed at a crossroads this year
  5. [5]News articleYahoo Finance· February 18, 2026
    ‘I could pay my bills off the gold’: Californians say the Gold Rush never ended — and treasure is still turning up
  6. [6]News articleYahoo Finance· February 18, 2026
    Markets bet on spring rate cut as inflation falls
  7. [7]News articleYahoo Finance· February 12, 2026
    My wife and I are 79, barely surviving on $2K in Social Security. We’re terrified our money won’t last: What can we do?
  8. [8]News articleYahoo Finance· January 27, 2026
    S&P Cotality Case-Shiller Index Reports Annual Gain In November 2025
  9. [9]News articleYahoo Finance· February 5, 2026
    Tradeweb Reports Record January 2026 Total Trading Volume of $65.5 Trillion and Record Average Daily Volume of $3.1 Trillion

In this story · Knowledge Files

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
ESMO 2026 Oncology Catalyst Cluster: Ivonescimab's PDUFA Date and Small-Cap Biotech Delistings
ESMO 2026 (Oct 22-24) concentrates a wave of oncology readouts. Summit's ivonescimab (10 presentations, positive HARMONi-GI1 OS, new EA2251 Phase II/III with ECOG-ACRIN) leads, ahead of its FDA PDUFA date of 2026-11-14, and Daiichi Sankyo's DXd ADC platform (REJOICE-Ovarian, DESTINY-Lung04, TUXEDO-3) follows. At the other end of the capital-markets spectrum, micro-cap Spago Nanomedical is moving to delist from Nasdaq First North (board resolution Oct 22, EGM Nov 19, application Jan 2027). Pivotal data and regulatory milestones are rewarding well-funded late-stage players, while cash-constrained early-stage developers are exiting public markets.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,525 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com